May
20, 2013 by Bob Barnett
You may have heard the big
news that fitness for men in middle age is associated with a lower risk of
several different cancers. The study looked at 17,000 men and
found that those who were fittest at age 50 were much less likely to develop
lung and colon cancer, and much less likely to die from prostate cancer—20 to
25 years later.
So it pays to get fit and
stay fit. One intriguing finding: Simply increasing your fitness level by one
“metabolic equivalent”, or MET, was associated with a 14 percent lower risk
of cancer mortality—and a 23 reduction
in cardiovascular mortality. Other research has found that increasing your
fitness by one MET reduces your risk of dying from all
causes by 15
percent or more.
So it seems like this is a
pretty key thing to do. But what does it mean to increase your fitness by one
MET? To find out, we turned to Richard T. Cotton, MA, national director of
certification for the American College of Sports Medicine. “A MET is a unit of
oxygen consumption and metabolic rate—and therefore, exercise intensity,” he
said. It’s kind of a research thing, he said. So it takes a little translation
to make sense of it for everyday life.
Bottom line: It’s
important to get not just enough aerobic exercise each week, but also to
improve your ability to exercise intensely. In other words, fitness matters.
Moderate versus Vigorous
Intensity
The American College of
Sports Medicine (ACSM) recommends that healthy
adults get 150 minutes a week, spread out over five days, of moderate-intensity exercise.
That’s the kind you can do while speaking in full sentences without gasping for
breath.
But ACSM also suggests
that you can get the same benefit from three 20-minute bouts of
vigorous-intensity exercise. That’s the kind that leaves you breathless after
speaking just a few words, not a full sentence. If you calculate heart rate,
moderate intensity exercise is 60 to 70 percent of your maximal heart rate,
while vigorous is 85 percent. (You can estimate your maximal heart rate by
subtracting your age from 220. Thus, if you’re 40, it’s 180.) Or you can
combine moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity exercise over, say 90 minutes
a week.
Increasing your fitness by
one MET means you can go faster or harder without running out of breath—or
having to stop from exhaustion.
Go MET!
“A low-aerobic fitness in a middle-aged man is about 8 METS,” says Cotton. “Average is about 11, and high aerobic fitness is greater than 16.” In research studies, MET is measured by putting people on a treadmill and increasing speed until they’re so exhausted they can’t continue. But you can get figure out your exercise intensity by paying attention to how fast you do a regular aerobic routine, like a run or a bike ride. “Get a sense of the MET value of your typical continuous workout, and then compare it with the subsequent MET value for the same distance,” says Cotton.
“A low-aerobic fitness in a middle-aged man is about 8 METS,” says Cotton. “Average is about 11, and high aerobic fitness is greater than 16.” In research studies, MET is measured by putting people on a treadmill and increasing speed until they’re so exhausted they can’t continue. But you can get figure out your exercise intensity by paying attention to how fast you do a regular aerobic routine, like a run or a bike ride. “Get a sense of the MET value of your typical continuous workout, and then compare it with the subsequent MET value for the same distance,” says Cotton.
Here’s an example: You can
walk a mile in about 17 minutes. That’s 3.5 miles per hour (m.p.h.). It’s
reasonably brisk walking pace. If you go faster, you run out of breath. But you
try to go a little faster each day, and at the end of a month, you can walk the
mile in 15 minutes. You’ve increased your MET by 1.3. Another example:
Increasing your running speed for a mile from 10 minutes to 8 and a half
minutes—that boosts your MET by 1.2.
Or let’s say you’re
walking that mile in 17 minutes. That’s an MET of 4.3. Now you start jogging.
Within a few weeks, you’re jogging that same mile in 11.5 minutes (5.2 m.p.h.).
Your MET has increased from 4.3 to 9. “That’s a 4.7 MET improvement,” says
Cotton. (If you want to look up your own activity level in terms of MET, Google has a site for that.)
If we pushed the numbers
in the recent study, that kind of improvement, sustained over a lifetime, would
be associated with a 66 percent reduction in cancer risk. Pretty amazing—but
also speculative. For one, the study hasn’t even been published in a peer review
journal—it’s being presented at a cancer conference, and will be published
later. It’s an observational study, so it’s not showing cause and effect. And
the benefits are greatest in going from the lowest level of fitness to a
moderate level, so you can’t expect to keep lowering your cancer risk
indefinitely as you get progressively fitter.
But the new research,
combined with existing research on benefits in terms of heart disease and a
longer life, add to a growing body of evidence that fitness intensity makes a
difference. One interesting finding of the current study is that fitness was
linked with lower cancer risk independently of body weight.
So get your moderate
aerobic exercise. Being more active on more days of the week is still a core
goal for cardiovascular health. So is strength training, and flexibility.
But fitness intensity
matters too. So push it, guys.
Bob Barnett is the Men’s
Health, and Family Health, editor for Knowmore.tv.
Source: http://knowmore.tv/men-2/why-fitness-matters-cancer-heart-disease-and-longevity/
Related Articles:
Questions people ask about cancer - part 1 |
Stricter EU rules on paraben |
This document is provided for reference purposes only and not necessarily reflect the opinion of bynaturael’s team . Train your mind to test every thought and keep on searching the final truth that satisfies the conscience inside you. Please visit our blog: bynaturael.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment